Post by joita9865 on Oct 26, 2023 5:24:29 GMT -6
This regulation provides for the possibility of concluding an agreement between three entities on the transfer of an employee to another employer for a limited time. Thus, the employer employing an employee undertakes to grant him unpaid leave for a strictly defined purpose, i.e. for the employee to start work at a predetermined time with another employer with whom he has concluded an agreement committing to employ this employee. The end of the unpaid leave period obliges the employee to return to work for the original employer, who is obliged to allow the employee to work under the terms and conditions specified in the employment contract.
The parties may also agree to end unpaid leave early. In the judgment of the Court philippines photo editor of Appeal in Gdańsk of March , , ref. act III AUa / it is indicated that: An exception to this rule is unpaid leave granted by the employer to the employee pursuant to Art. § of the Labor Code, with the employee's consent, expressed in writing, to perform work for another employer for the period specified in the agreement concluded between the employers on this matter. This leave is a special type of unpaid leave, as it is granted to perform work for another employer. Transferring employees between employers in this mode makes it possible to regulate employment - without the need to make layoffs, especially group layoffs.
It is reasonable to believe that this leave is granted primarily in the interest of the employer, who thus avoids the obligation to pay severance pay for employees' dismissal, but it can also be considered beneficial for the employee as it protects him against job loss. Additionally, it is worth remembering that the regulation in question shows that in the case of unpaid leave in this mode, an employee is "loaned" to another employer.
The parties may also agree to end unpaid leave early. In the judgment of the Court philippines photo editor of Appeal in Gdańsk of March , , ref. act III AUa / it is indicated that: An exception to this rule is unpaid leave granted by the employer to the employee pursuant to Art. § of the Labor Code, with the employee's consent, expressed in writing, to perform work for another employer for the period specified in the agreement concluded between the employers on this matter. This leave is a special type of unpaid leave, as it is granted to perform work for another employer. Transferring employees between employers in this mode makes it possible to regulate employment - without the need to make layoffs, especially group layoffs.
It is reasonable to believe that this leave is granted primarily in the interest of the employer, who thus avoids the obligation to pay severance pay for employees' dismissal, but it can also be considered beneficial for the employee as it protects him against job loss. Additionally, it is worth remembering that the regulation in question shows that in the case of unpaid leave in this mode, an employee is "loaned" to another employer.
Same to you 
ya it's a open forum and ya can post any thing ya want! Glad ya decided to check it out!
great to have you here
